0% complete
Every facility has a different combination of operational, reliability, maintenance, compliance, and capital-planning priorities.
Select the conditions that apply to your asset, and the tool will identify the NAES Asset Solutions services most closely aligned with your needs, ranked, explained, and organized into a recommended engagement sequence.
Work through the steps below. In Step 2, answer Yes, No, or I’m not sure for each condition. A Yes answer adds weight to the NAES Asset Solutions services most closely aligned with that need.
These selections shape and contextualize the recommendations. They do not, on their own, produce a service result.
These are the primary weighted selections. Open each category and flag the issues that apply. This is where the recommendations are earned.
What outcomes are most important to your organization? Select up to three. These act as scoring multipliers that lift the most relevant services.
Select any that apply. This helps the tool judge urgency and sequencing without requiring you to describe the situation.
When do you need to act? Timing affects urgency and sequencing, not which services fit.
The tool scores every NAES Asset Solutions service against your selections, then presents the highest-ranking options with a plain explanation of why each was selected.
Each Yes answer adds weight to the services aligned with that condition. Desired outcomes, asset stage, and business triggers provide additional context for the ranking.
Every service accumulates a score from the needs you identify. The best-fit service and strongest supporting services rise to the top, with an explanation based on your answers.
Certain combinations of Yes answers can generate an integrated recommendation and a suggested engagement sequence.
The tool's recommendations map to these working solution families. Names are for tool presentation and are validated by the NAES Asset Solutions team before any engagement is defined.
Facility Condition Assessment, asset-risk identification, and corrective-action prioritization to establish a defensible condition baseline.
Critical Equipment Evaluation, Single Point of Failure Evaluation, and maintenance-strategy review focused on availability and risk.
O&M Assessment, Operational Excellence Review, and performance and cost benchmarking of the operating model.
Maximo/CMMS assessment, data-quality review, PM review, and workflow evaluation to reconnect data to reliability.
Condition evaluation, repair-versus-replace analysis, and capital prioritization for aging assets.
NFPA 70B implementation, electrical maintenance-program review, and documentation alignment.
A cross-functional engagement combining condition, reliability, O&M, CMMS, capital, and risk findings into one sequenced plan.